<![CDATA[9/11]]><![CDATA[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]]><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]><![CDATA[Terrorism]]><![CDATA[Zohran Mamdani]]>Featured

Friday’s Final Word – HotAir

The thing about browsing tabs, they’re sure and bound to fade





Ed: Absolute ghouls, and also absolute idiots. David wrote about this today already, but the political malpractice here is evident. If these two Islamist apologists couldn’t maintain decorum for an hour, then they should have avoided attending the event altogether. This is precisely why the 9/11 families didn’t want Mamdani to attend in the first place – they knew he didn’t respect them or oppose the ideology that created this horror. 

===

NY Post: The New York City Democratic Socialists of America darlings appeared all smiles in a live feed of the ceremony, interspersed with shots of a man cradling his head in his arms and bawling his eyes out while friends and family reading out the names of their departed loved ones from the podium.

Pointed reactions online to the apparent show of disrespect at the site where thousands of Americans were murdered by terrorists were quick to emerge. 

“Why the f–k are these two laughing?!?” Meghan McCain, former “The View” host and daughter of late GOP Sen. John McCain, wrote on X.

“How the hell do you laugh while the names of those murdered on 9/11 are being read aloud? Why would you do so?” wondered Texas GOP Sen. Ted Cruz.

Ed: This should put a spike through AOC’s rumored presidential aspirations. Every opponent she faces will use this clip to expose her as a heartless ideologue who disrespected a memorial service for terrorism victims. And it should follow her around for the rest of her life. It might even be a clip that Chuck Schumer will use in his next Senate bid, as AOC has long been interested in challenging him. How many Democrats would choose someone yukking it up at a 9/11 remembrance over the current incumbent? We may soon see. 

===





Ed: Crocodile tears. And the Internet is forever, too. Mike Rogers will need to get busy. 

===

John Ondrasik at Fox News: Imagine standing in your neighborhood on September 12, 2001, and telling your neighbor what America might look like 25 years later.

Imagine telling them that radical leftist ideologies, hostile to America, would infiltrate some of our most prestigious universities and metastasize through mainstream and social media. That members of Congress would echo propaganda promoted by terrorist organizations such as Hamas. That candidates could associate with people who openly express hatred for America — or even suggest America deserved 9/11 — and still win elections and govern American cities. …

The aftermath of Hamas’s October 7 terrorist attack in Israel provided another warning about the moral collapse taking hold within many of our institutions. Before Israel had even buried its dead, we witnessed people in the West rationalizing, excusing and even celebrating the slaughter.

It raises an uncomfortable question: If an attack on the scale of 9/11 occurred in America today, would we still respond as one people, one country?

Ed: Imagine telling them that NYC would elect a Hamas sympathizer as its mayor before the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 attack arrived. Imagine telling them that Democrats would nominate someone connected to both al-Qaeda and the Blind Sheikh to Congress in New Jersey, just across from Manhattan. Or that Democrats would nominate a man backed by people connected to the Muslim Brotherhood to the US Senate in Michigan. John writes that it would have been seen as “lunacy,” because that’s exactly what it is. 

===





Ed: As both David and John have written today, the media and culture want to make 9/11 about Muslim victimhood. We do not have to comply with that. Mamdani is literally laughing at the deaths and destruction that took place in the city he now runs. We do not have to forget that, either. 

===

Douglas Murray at The Free Press: This trend of false theories didn’t begin immediately after the 2001 attacks. It took a while for the sinister and idiotic industry to get going. At first, those opposed to American actions in Afghanistan and Iraq kept their insinuations vague.

In 2002, the increasingly cranky left-wing writer Gore Vidal attacked the George W. Bush administration’s response to the attacks, writing, “We still don’t know by whom we were struck that infamous Tuesday, or for what true purpose.” Since Vidal was not a stupid man, one can only assume that he had decided to overlook the most obvious answer: America had been attacked by people who had boasted of attacking it and whose devotees had hijacked and crashed the planes involved. Within hours, it was clear that the attacks were the work of the terrorist group al-Qaeda, acting on the orders of its then-leader, Osama bin Laden. Al-Qaeda openly claimed responsibility, and its leadership boasted of its success in carrying out the attack, including in the spoken and written statements of bin Laden himself. None of this was difficult to find for anyone even minimally interested in the matter.

Still, this kind of insinuation is something that anyone interested in conspiracy theories will immediately recognize. It involves ignoring the most obvious evidence while insisting that the least obvious—or nonexistent—evidence deserves closer scrutiny.

Ed: It’s a virulent form of Gnosticism. The purveyors of these theories set themselves up as the Truly Enlightened, while others are either benighted or In On It. There are some serious financial incentives to creating and maintaining a cult, which can’t be overlooked in any analysis. But at its core, this is Gnosticism applied in a secular context. 





===

Ed: Meh. Why rip pages out of a Bible for 9/11? If these “direct action” activists had an ounce of courage, they would rip pages out of a Qu’ran in protest of what actually produced the terror attacks. This is nothing but gutless performativism for the lowest stakes possible. 

===

Free Beacon: American University in Washington, D.C., will host a symposium on the 25th anniversary of 9/11 that features an “Islamophobia” expert who has lamented the “extrajudicial assassinations” of 9/11 masterminds Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri.

Maha Hilal, the cofounder of the Justice for Muslims Collective, has also defended Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, attack, which many Israelis consider their version of 9/11, as a laudable act of “resistance” against the Jewish state.

Hilal will appear on a panel Friday evening entitled “Tracing the Impact of 9/11 Forever Wars: From 2001 to the Present,” hosted by American University’s School of International Service, whose alumni include Obama national security adviser Susan Rice, “antiracism” scholar Ibram X. Kendi, and Ayman Mohyeldin, the recently demoted Israel-bashing MS NOW contributor. …

In an Aug. 4, 2022, article for Middle East Eye, a U.K.-based outlet that is allegedly funded by the Qatari government, Hilal bemoaned the “extrajudicial assassinations” carried out against bin Laden, al-Zawahiri, and ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

Ed: “American” University. Riiiiiiiiiight.

===





Ed: Let me amend my statement above. The real victims of 9/11 are Muslims and the Protection Racket Media. Get a f***ing grip, NYT. 

===

NY Post: United Airlines scrapped a “9/11 memorial tribute” that would have seen a Boeing 777 fly low over Denver accompanied by a squadron of F-16s after it was ripped for being possibly “the worst memorial idea anyone has ever planned.”

The air display was meant to evoke the harrowing scenes on Sept. 11, 2001, when fighter jets were scrambled to intercept hijacked aircraft in US airspace, and was scheduled for 9:03 a.m., the precise minute terrorists crashed United Airlines Flight 175 into the South Tower of the World Trade Center. …

The reactions on social media were swift and condemning, with many wondering how the idea came to pass in the first place.

“Who thought this was a good idea?” one incredulous X user wondered.

“This has to be one of the most tone-deaf stunts ever,” said another.

Ed: Whoever came up with this idea should have his/her head examined. Whoever approved it should have his/her position reconsidered. 

===

… and our great and catastrophic mistake was to spend the last 50 or so years pandering to them in a futile attempt to make them like us. 

They won’t. Get over it. 

My Temu Freudian analysis of these inbred third worlders is that they hate us ’cause they ain’t us.

Ed: Exactly. The impulse to look inward is really just a mechanism designed to disguise the dangers facing us and pretend we can disarm it through therapy-speak and some USAID cash. After 25 years, Peachy’s conclusion is long overdue, as are the policies designed around it. 





===

Noah Rothman at NRO: “Islamism likewise produces murder and oppression,” Cruz continued, “from the forced wearing of hijabs to the stoning of rape victims. From the systematic murder of homosexuals to honor killings and the barbarism of October 7 and 9/11.”

He’s right, of course. There is a “red-green alliance” overtaking the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party’s DSA-adjacent figures do seem to despise America as it’s presently constituted. They’re not exactly shy about advertising their “hatred of the United States Constitution” — they certainly have unveiled contempt for its fundamentals, like the separation of powers.

It doesn’t do us any good to pretend that none of this is true, even if that risks offending the delicate sensibilities of those who find themselves attracted to socialism. My job isn’t to flatter their pretensions and assure them that their intentions are noble, even if those intentions might lead them astray. Rather, it’s to be blunt about the nature of the threat that the progressive left is incubating.

Ed: That should be the job of everyone. 

===

===

… we were reminded that light is not so easily extinguished.

“The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.”

John 1:5

Today, we remember the innocent lives lost. We honor those who gave their lives trying to save others. We pray for the families who still carry that loss.

May God bless them.

May God bless those who serve.

And may God bless America.

We will never forget.

September 11, 2001.





===

Last night’s lyric: “Summer of ’69” by Bryan Adams.


Editor’s Note: If we thought our job in pushing back against the Academia/media/Democrat censorship complex was over with the election, think again. This is going to be a long fight. If you’re digging these Final Word posts and want to join the conversation in the comments—and support independent platforms—why not join our VIP Membership program? Choose VIP to support Hot Air and access our premium content, VIP Gold to extend your access to all Townhall Media platforms and participate in this show, or VIP Platinum to get access to even more content and discounts on merchandise. Use the promo code FIGHT to join or to upgrade your existing membership level today, and get 60% off!





Source link

Related Posts

1 of 4,305