After evil assassinated Charlie Kirk in Utah, the country absorbed the news, processed the facts, and understood the gravity: A nationally recognized conservative voice was cut down in broad daylight. His family mourned, while investigators pursued the killer.
I don’t need to go into the details any more than others have; the tragedy spoke for itself.
The reaction that followed demands attention: the activist left didn’t respond with sadness or sober reflection; in fact, it didn’t allow his family time for grief.
Instead, the left responded with celebration; social media threads filled with laughter, cheap shots, and open glee. Influencers treated the assassination as comedy material, and commentators suggested he deserved it!
Instantly, the cruelty surfaced, as if the death of a political opponent and Christian apologist were a moment for joy instead of grief.
It’s a reaction that revealed something more profound than simply political division; it showed a movement comfortable with violence when the target stands on the right. The assassination became an excuse for vindictive humor, while the victim’s humanity didn’t matter — only the satisfaction of seeing an opponent fall.
Cruelty That No Longer Pretends To Be Outrage
When Charlie Sheen talked about Kirk’s murder, Joe Rogan’s stunned expression captured the shift better than any headline. Both men expressed their sympathies for Kirk’s family, while Rogan openly worried about the road our country seemingly is taking:
“Charlie Kirk gets shot, and people are celebrating. Like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. You want people to die that you disagree with? Like, where are we right now on the scale of one to civil war? Where are we? Are we at seven? Because I thought we were five,” Rogan said. “I thought we were like four. Four or five. But after the Charlie Kirk thing, I’m like, ‘Oh, we might be like seven.’”
If Hunter Biden thought people considered him a wasted meatsack, his conspiracy attacks against the journalist who exposed him and his laptop delivered the kind of venom that thrives in a culture where political hatred already runs hot, which took him further down that path.
There’s no ethics in what someone as horrendously ugly as Miranda Devine — physically and in terms of her ethics — does … They’re wh*res for money and she does it because she makes money.”
And when she goes to sleep at night, I’m sure she sleeps just fine — but I don’t know anybody who is going to be mourning her when she’s gone.
This behavior comes from a hive mindset, where conservatives are treated as the enemy, not as opponents.
A Pattern That’s Been Building for Years
The assassination of Charlie Kirk lands atop a long and painful list that the left refuses to believe exists.
- Left-wing mobs gathered outside the homes of conservative Supreme Court justices.
- A political extremist opened fire on Republican lawmakers and nearly killed Steve Scalise.
- Paul Pelosi absorbed a hammer attack while the left turned his injuries into late-night mockery.
- A driver tore through the Waukesha Christmas parade, and activists downplayed the motive.
- Jewish students across the nation’s campuses now face harassment and threats while progressive leaders frame intimidation as activism.
Excuses keep arriving as fast as the violence surfaces.
A Media Culture that Refuses to Tell the Full Story
Suppose a tight-leaning sniper had assassinated a left-wing figure. That case would’ve triggered wall-to-wall media coverage, with emergency roundtables and solemn editorials about the state of the nation.
However, because Charlie was a conservative who used his appearances to spew hateful rhetoric — according to the left — the tone shifted to neutrality, reporters softened language, and analysts tiptoed around the implications, avoiding discussions of the left’s celebration altogether.
Because the media understands the damage that such coverage would inflict on their preferred narrative, they use their silence as a shield for an increasingly hostile political culture.
The Moral Collapse Behind the Double Standard
A free society can’t survive when one political faction believes the death of its opponents is entertainment. Once, the left claimed to speak for compassion, a claim that collapsed when activists laughed at a man killed by a sniper’s bullet.
Their leaders continue to remain silent because condemnation tests the loyalty of their supporters, and the media refuses to expose it because it disrupts their ideological comfort zone.
Moral authority disappears the moment murder becomes a damn punchline.
What Happens When Silence Becomes Permission
Do you know how extremists listen to silence? They interpret it as approval for their actions while watching the celebration of Kirk’s death, concluding that more violence will earn the same applause.
Boundaries of acceptable behavior shift after a culture loses the instinct of recoiling at murder, especially one that happened in the eye of the public.
Online, because of its inherent anonymity, celebration becomes fuel when every reaction is unchallenged, raising the risk to public life.
Final Thoughts
The assassination of Charlie Kirk didn’t merely reveal the killer; it exposed a movement that can’t hide its pleasure when a conservative dies. Their celebration of Kirk’s death wasn’t a fringe glitch; it exposed a pattern, a feature, and a sign of moral collapse wrapped in political identity.
Danger is invited to the doorstep of a nation that laughs at political death, a reaction the media tried hiding. It failed, and the country clearly saw it.
A line was crossed, and the consequences won’t stay theoretical for long.
PJM will never excuse violence from one side while condemning it from the other. If you want commentary that calls out hatred no matter where it hides, and refuses to let the media bury stories that matter, join us. Your subscription keeps honest reporting alive. Use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.
