From the outset, all the evidence suggested that COVID-19 was deadly to the old and infirm, and a bad flu for everybody else.
Focused protection for the vulnerable and developing a vaccine to alleviate the burden on them were policies that made the most sense. And given that only a small fraction of the population was especially vulnerable, when the vaccine was rushed out, it made sense to give it–even without long-term testing–to those at high risk of death.
Of course, that’s not what happened. The risks were exaggerated, and the “protection” measures were mostly useless, and when the vaccine–not a standard vaccine, but a novel mRNA vaccine that was untested–the government tried to force everyone to take it.
It’s as if you had asked public health officials to develop the worst possible policy measures and implement them. The damage done has been immense, and there has still been no reckoning.
Read the full study here: https://t.co/hC08XVbHj0
— Dr. Simone Gold (@drsimonegold) June 25, 2025
By now, any sane person knows that the effect on children has been perhaps the most damaging, and a new Czech study indicates that it isn’t only the children who were traumatized and robbed of education during the pandemic who suffer. It includes the children who will never be born because health officials claimed to know that the vaccines were safe and effective for women of childbearing age.
Obviously, many women were concerned about the effects of the vaccine on their fertility or, in the case of pregnant women, their unborn children. A massive public relations campaign was implemented to assure them that the vaccine was not only safe but necessary. TV commercials were cut, recommendations were made, and all those people with compassionate smiles and white coats reassured nervous women that they were doing the right thing, injecting an experimental drug into their bodies.
It was all a lie, and they knew it. Because there was absolutely zero data on the effects of the mRNA shots on fertility or fetuses, nor could there be. mRNA shots were new, basically untested outside a few hundred people in a rushed study, and everybody was flying blind. While that may have been justifiable in the case of treating people at great risk of death already, healthy women of childbearing age were at almost no risk at all.
Abstract
Background
Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccination on human menstrual cycle characteristics have been observed, but limited data are available on the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination status and birth rates.
Objectives
Therefore, we used nationwide data from the Czech Republic to examine rates of successful conceptions (SCs), that is, conceptions leading to live births 9 months later, for women who were either vaccinated or unvaccinated against COVID-19 before SC.
Methods
Summary monthly COVID-19 vaccination and birth data for women in the Czech Republic aged 18–39 years were retrieved for the period from January 2021 to December 2023. The numbers of SCs per month per 1000 women were calculated for preconception-vaccinated or unvaccinated women, respectively, as well as the number of SCs per month per 1000 women for all women aged 18–39 years.
Results
During the study period, there were approximately 1,300,000 women aged 18–39 years in the Czech Republic, and the proportion of COVID-19-vaccinated women increased from January 2021 until reaching a steady state of around 70% by the end of 2021. At least from June 2021, SCs per 1000 women were considerably lower for women who were vaccinated, compared to those that were unvaccinated, before SC. Furthermore, SC rates for the vaccinated group were much lower than expected based on their proportion of the total population.
Conclusions
In the Czech Republic, SC rates were substantially lower for women vaccinated against COVID-19 before SC than for those who were not vaccinated. These hypothesis-generating and preliminary results call for further studies of the potential influence of COVID-19 vaccination on human fecundability and fertility.
In a study covering 1.3 million women of childbearing age, published in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, a simple analysis was done comparing the rate of conception between women who were vaccinated and those who were not, and there is a dramatic difference in the results.
This should come as no surprise by now–early on in the vaccination program, women experienced serious changes in their menstrual cycles, and subsequent studies showed that other changes to fertility were likely. The menstrual changes were a red flag that the public health officials ignored, reassuring everyone that they were of no concern.
They made those assurances based on nothing but hope–or indifference. Their commitment wasn’t to the health of the women but to the viability of their vaccine program, regardless of the actual costs and benefits.
Their view of “informed consent” was simple: if people are informed, they might not consent. So don’t inform. Just lie.
No doubt, many of the people who engaged in this mass deception believed they were doing it for our own good. Propelled by a righteous cause, flush with power, and a zeal to make their mark, they bullied the rest of us in what amounted to a massive social and medical experiment with no controls, no forethought.
How many women will be robbed of fertility? It is impossible to say. What we do know is that each and every one of them was lied to in a manner that we define as a crime against humanity. We also know that in cases asymptotically close to zero, the women did not benefit from the vaccine. They were at almost no risk from COVID, and now they have lost their future children.
The government-generated mass panic was evil. The forced closures of much of our economy were evil. The “comply or die” measures were evil. School closures were evil. Setting people against each other was evil. The forced vaccinations were evil. The lies were evil.
This study should be front-page news, and talked about 24/7/365 until people get it through their heads that the people who run our lives are not “experts,” but budding tyrants so drunk with power that they experimented on every person in the world without worrying about the damage they could do.
It was not benign. Their “good intentions” don’t matter. Portland voters have “good intentions.” All those nice liberals destroying their cities have “good intentions.”
What matters is results, and the results are devastating.
Don’t expect much discussion about this paper, though. It is embarrassing. It was a big oops. And there are too many human beings anyway, right?
