A lot of conservatives think that Jasmine Crockett was humiliated by our proving that she slandered Lee Zeldin by claiming he took money from Jeffrey Epstein.
Zeldin indeed received a contribution from a man named Jeffrey Epstein, but not the Jeffrey Epstein we’re all talking about. It was a sly slander, and she was, in fact, not at all humiliated or embarrassed. She was proud because more people heard her smear than that it was a lie.
Yes Crockett, a physician named Dr. Jeffrey Epstein (who is a totally different person than the other Jeffrey Epstein) donated to a prior campaign of mine.
NO 👏 FREAKIN 👏 RELATION 👏 YOU 👏 GENIUS!!! https://t.co/gYQlcUd2we
— Lee Zeldin (@LeeMZeldin) November 19, 2025
Conservatives still believe that facts and a passing relationship to reality matter in political fights with Democrats. We are wrong. They are immersed in Critical Theory, which holds that everything is a “narrative,” and “narratives” are simply a means to gain power over others. Every utterance is a power play, so they utter what they believe will get them power.
Hence, Crockett has no shame. Instead, she is smirking about it.
“I was not attempting to mislead anybody” -Jasmine Crockett, about her attempt to mislead everybody about which Jeffrey Epstein was giving to her Democrat colleagues pic.twitter.com/SVh7IsppsU
— Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) November 20, 2025
It is a fool’s errand to believe a single thing a Leftist says. Some Democrats who are liberals will tell the truth as they see it, but anybody who is a leftist is almost by definition a liar in the terms that we understand. They may or may not be imparting facts at times, but nothing they say is not part of a power play. That is the purpose of speech.
STORY: https://t.co/pXWY3KWTdm
— Alpha News (@AlphaNews) November 21, 2025
I bring all this up because of another horrific slander, and another Jasmine Crockett-style “clarification.” It comes from Minnesota’s own transgender leftist sexual deviant child-grooming State Legislator Leigh Finke. Finke is a grotesque simulacrum of a female who has pushed horrific legislation intended to groom children into sterilization, mutilation, and sexual promiscuity.
The White House has responded to claims made by Minnesota state Rep. Leigh Finke that President Donald Trump “is a child rapist.”
In a statement to Alpha News, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said: “You’d have to be truly sick in the head to make such an absurdly false claim.”
Finke wrote in an Instagram post a week ago: “I don’t know what happens in this current political climate when we definitively prove that our president is a participant in a massive sex trafficking ring organized by his friends.”
The post went on to state that “it is one thing for us to presume what we know in the face of mounting evidence. But it’s another thing to confirm the reality … that the man who is our elected president is a child rapist.”
“Release the files. Prosecute these predators, and find justice for the victims,” Finke added, referring to the government’s files on deceased financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Ironically, the person with whom Trump spent hours was Virginia Giuffre, who did spend time with Trump at Mar-a-Lago shortly before he kicked Epstein out of the club for being a pervert. She, prior to her untimely death by suicide, made clear that Trump was not an abuser at all.
It’s the same tactic Democrats have used to claim simultaneously that Trump and Epstein were buds, but also that we know Trump is evil because Jeffrey Epstein hated him.
BREAKING: Newly released emails show Jeffrey Epstein thought Trump was one of the worst people he knew, with “not one decent cell in his body.”
He went on to describe Trump with one word:
“Dangerous.” pic.twitter.com/kMyRwkgk8i
— Democrats (@TheDemocrats) November 13, 2025
See what I mean about their use of language? Nothing has to be consistent; they just throw crap against the wall, hoping that people will be moved by whatever they say.
Finke, as with Crockett, is now doing the “I didn’t say precisely THAT” dance, because of course he is. He doesn’t want to be sued, and backtracking is irrelevant because he got the accusation out there.
Finke posted on the social media site BlueSky on Friday above a link to the original Alpha News story, attempting to clarify the comments.
Finke wrote: “Yes I did. (To be fair I did not say Trump is a child rapist. I said we as a nation should prepare for the potentiality that our president is a child rapist).”
It’s the same bulls**t the Democrats are pulling with the “don’t follow illegal orders” video. They want to plant the idea that illegal orders are being made and that soldiers should rebel, but they are now saying that they are only talking about potential illegal orders, so no harm, no foul.
Bulls**t.
Harry Reid famously accused Mitt Romney of failing to pay his taxes—an accusation he made up out of whole cloth. After the election, when it was proven to be entirely false, he was asked why he did it.
His answer was simple: “Romney didn’t win, did he?
Time Magazine even interviewed him about it, and he had no regrets.
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid has no regrets with falsely accusing Mitt Romney of paying zero taxes for ten years during the 2012 presidential elections.
“So the word is out that he has not paid any taxes for ten years,” Reid said on the Senate floor in August 2012. “Let him prove that he has paid taxes, because he hasn’t.”
Under criticism and repeated denials by Romney, Reid later put out a statement backed by an “extremely credible source,” which turned out to be billionaire Jon Huntsman, Sr, the father of the former Utah governor and Romney rival, according to Double Down by Mark Halperin and John Heilemann. PolitiFact rated Reid’s allegation “Pants on Fire.”
When asked about his comments in a new interview by CNN’s Dana Bash, Reid, who recently announced he would retire in 2017 after his term is up, rebuffed those who said his attacks were “McCarthyite.”
“Well, they can call it whatever they want,” Reid said. “Romney didn’t win, did he?”
It is a mistake to take anything said by leftists as an expression of what they believe, because they quite literally believe that language exists to be a weapon in the search for power. Concepts are tools, words are weapons, and normies exist to be manipulated.
Everything is a hoax.
