Featured

DEI references vanish from school board meetings amid Trump administration purge

References to diversity, equity and inclusion at K-12 school board meetings have declined sharply alongside Trump administration efforts to purge race-based programs from public education. Here’s what you need to know about the DEI decline in schools:

The sharp decline

Burbio tracking shows dramatic drop in DEI mentions:

  • School tracking website reported DEI mentions declined from 38.1% of board minutes in last three months of 2024
  • Dropped to 32.9% in first three months of this year
  • Declined further to 28.3% of school board meetings between April and June
  • Reverses several increases under Biden administration

The federal pressure campaign

Trump administration targeting DEI programs at all education levels:

  • “The drop coincides with the federal government instituting policies that target programs in the DEI area”
  • Burbio President Dennis Roche said in email
  • Federal campaign targeting DEI programs expanded from grammar school to college
  • Analysis represents more than 70% of nation’s public school population

The administration’s rationale

Trump team says race-based programs violate civil rights law:

  • President Trump canceled Biden administration programs supporting DEI training and initiatives
  • Programs designed to give disadvantaged minorities a leg up
  • Administration insists spending tax dollars on race-based programs violates federal civil rights law
  • Claims programs favor some people based on skin color

The enforcement threats

Education and Justice departments issue warnings:

  • Education Department threatened to withhold federal funding in April letter
  • Threat targeted elementary schools refusing to end DEI programs
  • Justice Department issued new federal funding guidance last week
  • Accused DEI “programs or initiatives” of violating anti-discrimination laws

The expert analysis

University of Chicago economist criticizes administration approach:

  • Steven Durlauf said “administration’s attacks on DEI have gone far, far beyond what may be plausibly justified”
  • Attacks “become an effort to teach a triumphalist, inaccurate version of American history”
  • Version “ignores the deep roots of contemporary group inequalities”
  • Durlauf specializes in wealth inequality

The rebranding concern

Schools may simply rename programs to avoid scrutiny:

  • Impossible to know how many schools renamed DEI programs to evade purge
  • “Schools may drop the acronym, but the ideology often remains”
  • New labels include “belonging,” “culturally responsive teaching,” or “inclusive practices”
  • Jessica Bartnick, former Dallas school board member, provided examples

The operational continuity

DEI principles continue under different names:

  • Schools eliminating honors classes to fight “racism” still operating under DEI principles
  • Grading policies ignoring performance or deadlines also DEI-based
  • Terms related to DEI remain “widely used in K-12”
  • Appear in “job titles, district mission statements, academic courses, district committees”

The conservative perspective

Republicans reject DEI as lowering academic standards:

  • Conservatives view DEI as decades-long effort to lower standards for Black and Hispanic students
  • Students who historically score lower than peers
  • Effort to force equal outcomes prioritizes group identity over merit
  • Julie Giordano, Wicomico County Republican executive, said DEI “promotes division rather than true merit”

The liberal defense

Supporters say conservatives distorted DEI purpose:

  • “DEI was all about recognizing the importance of diversity in schools, and in the wider society”
  • Tyrone Howard, UCLA education professor specializing in racial equity
  • “The right hijacked the term, and made it to be something that it is not”
  • Dispute characterization as reverse discrimination against White and Asian students

The quiet removal strategy

Officials avoiding confrontation over DEI programs:

  • “Many district officials quietly remove DEI language from agendas and communications rather than defend it”
  • Programs renamed “under generic terms like ’culture initiatives’”
  • Giordano called this approach “most frustrating”
  • Officials choose stealth over public defense

The future predictions

Education insiders expect DEI return under Democrats:

  • Most predict DEI will become popular topic again at school board meetings
  • Would occur next time Democrats retake White House
  • “Trump administration is using the language of civil rights to attack DEI”
  • Jonathan Zimmerman, University of Pennsylvania education professor, notes struggle over civil rights legacy

Read more:

Report finds DEI vanishing from school board meetings amid Trump-led purge


This article is written with the assistance of generative artificial intelligence based solely on Washington Times original reporting and wire services. For more information, please read our AI policy or contact Ann Wog, Managing Editor for Digital, at awog@washingtontimes.com


The Washington Times AI Ethics Newsroom Committee can be reached at aispotlight@washingtontimes.com.

Source link

Related Posts

1 of 7