Policies? Did Donald Trump discuss policies last night, or just expose Democrats as radicals?
The correct answer is … yes. Trump can do a lot in two hours, especially when his political opponents keep slipping on all of the banana peels he drops. Trump spent more than twenty minutes of the speech detailing his economic agenda and proposing new efforts to reduce prices and provide growth. That came just before Trump set his trap on immigration, and before Democrats stumbled into another on crime.
CNN polled viewers who watched the marathon event, and found that Trump made solid gains on the policy front:
CNN: 64% of speech watchers say President Trump’s polices will move the country in the right direction 🔥 pic.twitter.com/eaYoPeYBnG
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) February 25, 2026
“So, a lot of red meat for the base,” Jake Tapper comments. True, and on policy perhaps even less so than what followed in the Thunderdome that followed. However, it does remins us of the context of such polling, which is that the respondent pool for SOTU polls tends toward the already converted.
This comes up time and again in post-SOTU polling. The people who watch presidents delivering speeches in any context, even in the traditional SOTU setting, tend to be those who voted for that president. A much smaller subset comprises those whose jobs require them to watch it, such as the team here at Hot Air during the Biden Regency or the Obama Administration. Nathaniel Rakich wrote about this phenomenon for FiveThirtyEight after Trump’s 2020 SOTU, which went well in terms of post-speech polling but clearly didn’t have much impact beyond that:
State of the Union addresses usually have little impact on public opinion of the president. Gallup’s regular polling of the president’s approval rating, which goes back decades, enables us to compare polls taken immediately before and immediately after the State of the Union to check for any popularity bumps we might attribute to the speech. But according to Gallup, the average State of the Union address since 1978 has boosted the president’s approval rating by just 0.4 percentage points. In fact, a president’s approval rating is just as likely to go down as it is up after a State of the Union (the average movement in any direction is 2.7 points, which still isn’t very much). …
One reason why a State of the Union address may not change many Americans’ minds about the president is that the audience is disproportionately already fans of the president. Since at least the era of President George H.W. Bush, the people who have tuned in to watch the State of the Union have tended to be members of the president’s party, according to polls of viewers conducted shortly after the speech by Gallup, ABC News/Washington Post or CNN. For instance, last year, CNN’s sample of those who watched Trump’s State of the Union was 42 percent Republican, 22 percent Democratic.
Given the more sharply polarized reactions to Trump in this term, I’d suspect that the viewing audience might have been even more Republican this time. Non-Republicans certainly had more options this time, with Democrats holding counterprogrammed live events for those who wanted their own TDS validated. Those events were sparsely covered otherwise and may have arguably drained attention from the official Democrat response from Abigail Spanberger, but it may well have amplified the self-selecting nature of SOTU audiences.
That’s not to say that the CNN poll doesn’t matter at all. Trump picked up ten points during the speech among those watching, which at least indicates a firming of support among the GOP base. As the analyst points out, that pushed Trump back into his usual post-SOTU position on policy support, and that could definitely matter when it comes to midterm turnout, assuming that momentum can be sustained. It does not, however, properly measure public response to the speech in a predictive manner in terms of support in the overall electorate.
Trump did move the needle, and that’s significant, but … “red meat for the base” is not an inaccurate context for that measure.
Six years ago, Rakich and I were both skeptical that SOTUs actually move the needle electorally. This one could be different, but not on the basis of policy. Democrats showed up insisting on being disruptive and forcing the speech to be a, well, an interactive experience. In doing so, they stepped into at least two clear traps – one on immigration, the other on crime – that Trump and the GOP will use to beat Democrats over the head for the next eight months. Needles may be moving for a long time, thanks to Democrats’ refusal to stand for American citizens over illegal aliens, not to mention justice for the murder of a young woman at the hands of a violent lifetime criminal allowed to go free repeatedly despite his record. Crime and immigration enforcement are both 80/20 issues, and the optic of sitting and sulking Democrats over those issues will speak a lot longer than Trump spoke last night.
Editor’s Note: Thanks to President Trump, illegal immigration into our great country has virtually stopped. Despite the radical left’s lies, new legislation wasn’t needed to secure our border, just a new president.
Help us continue to report the truth about the president’s border policies and mass deportations. Join Hot Air VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership!
