The foul odor of Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes sticks like sewage to anybody who got too close. That human piece of garbage trafficked and abused young girls for years, hiding behind wealth and connections.
Now, his rotten legacy has splattered all over British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government.
Standing in the center is Lord Peter Mandelson, Starmer’s pick for U.S. ambassador, a man whose ties to Epstein scream unforgivable judgment. These aren’t minor slips of association; they’re shameful links to evil that taint everyone involved, including a leader who should’ve known better.
Mandelson’s Disgraceful Epstein Ties Exposed
Mandelson is a long-time Labour heavyweight and former business secretary under Gordon Brown who built his career on political savvy. But fresh files from the U.S. Justice Department show his deep friendship with Epstein lasted well after the predator’s 2008 conviction for child sex crimes.
Emails show Mandelson calling Epstein his “best pal” in a birthday letter, while sharing sensitive government info during a financial crisis. Allegedly, he leaked Downing Street emails and market details that could’ve helped Epstein’s shady dealings.
Mandelson received tens of thousands of dollars from Epstein or his associates; anybody cozying up to that monster after his conviction deserves zero sympathy; it’s pure moral rot.
In early 2025, Starmer appointed Mandelson as an ambassador, despite his known links to Epstein. Starmer sacked him in September 2025 after earlier files surfaced, but the latest Epstein file dump made things much worse.
Hoping to dodge more fallout, Mandelson resigned from the Labour Party and quit the House of Lords. Regardless, the Metropolitan Police in London launched a criminal probe into possible misconduct in public office.
Starmer’s “Regret” Rings Hollow
Starmer now admits he knew about Mandelson’s friendship with Epstein, but claims his ambassador repeatedly lied about how deep it went, calling the info-sharing disgraceful and appalling.
The PM stripped Mandelson’s titles, agreed to release appointment files to Parliament, and promised transparency. But his team tried to hide documents citing national security, only backing down after pressure.
Critics Aren’t Buying It
Labour MPs and opposition leaders have slammed Starmer’s judgment, calling it dangerously flawed. How could he send an Epstein pal to represent Britain in Washington?
Starmer’s defenders say he acted quickly once the facts emerged, but appointing someone linked to such trash shows incompetence or willful blindness.
Either way, it’s a leadership failure that stinks of poor vetting.
The Rot Spreads Through Labour
There are some Labour MPs who are questioning Starmer’s future as a leader, because this mess exposes cracks in Starmer’s hope for a stable government. Parliamentary committees are probing deeper, calling for Mandelson to be stripped of all honors. Voters aren’t seeing a strong leader; they’re seeing someone scrambling to get ahead of the messaging.
Epstein’s shadow darkens everything it touches, reminding us that being associated with predators like him destroys reputations and trust.
Promising sober leadership, Starmer allowed this self-made crisis to scream the opposite. He needs to fully explain how he missed or ignored the red flags. If he can’t, the pressure will crush him.
In politics, the stench of scandal like Epstein’s doesn’t fade; it festers until somebody cleans house.
PJ Media VIP members fuel reporting that holds power to account when leadership falters. Support independent analysis that does not shrink from uncomfortable questions.
