The Trump administration gave California a deadline to eliminate gender-ideology references from material used in a federally funded program aimed at preventing teen pregnancy, accusing the state of seeking to “indoctrinate our children.” Here’s what you need to know about the federal sex education funding dispute:
The federal ultimatum
Trump administration demands California curriculum changes:
- Administration for Children and Families sent Friday letter to California
- State has 60 days to remove gender-identity passages from program materials
- Must comply with Personal Responsibility Education Program requirements or lose federal grant
- Letter sent to Sydney Armendariz at California Department of Public Health
The official justification
HHS acting assistant secretary explains administration position:
- Andrew Gradison said “Trump administration will not tolerate use of federal funds for programs that indoctrinate our children”
- Called gender ideology content “disturbing” and “unacceptable”
- Said content “well outside the program’s core purpose”
- Administration committed to “radical transparency” for parents about school curricula
The PREP program details
Federal initiative targets teen pregnancy and STD prevention:
- Personal Responsibility Education Program has $75 million national budget
- California received $5,864,762 in PREP funding in fiscal 2023
- Program teaches youth ages 10-19 about abstinence and contraception
- Seeks to reduce teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases
The problematic content examples
Eight passages cited as exceeding program scope:
- “Rights, Respect and Responsibility” curriculum discusses transgender and gender queer identities
- “Making Proud Choices” curriculum defines gender identity for ages 12-18
- “Teen Talk High School” reminds students about anatomy and gender mismatches
- Content addresses people who “don’t identify as boys or girls”
The curriculum quotes
Specific examples of contested material:
- Middle school curriculum: “There are also people who don’t identify as boys or girls, but rather as transgender or gender queer”
- High school material: “Some men are born with female anatomy, some women are born with male anatomy”
- Ages 12-18 curriculum explains when “person’s inner feelings about gender identity don’t match the body”
- Materials discuss students’ “inner sense of your gender”
The legal argument
Administration cites Congressional intent:
- Congress created program to educate on “both abstinence and contraception”
- Statute “contains no mention of gender ideology” according to letter
- Current California curricula “out of compliance with PREP statute and HHS regulations”
- Material “must be modified” to meet federal requirements
The Biden administration approval
Previous administration had authorized contested content:
- California’s program material was approved under Biden administration
- Gradison said prior administration “erred in allowing PREP grants” for gender ideology
- Previous approval “exceeded the agency’s authority to administer the program”
- Agency authority must be “consistent with the authorizing legislation as enacted by Congress”
The compliance timeline
California given specific deadline for changes:
- State has until Aug. 19 to submit modified curricula
- Must provide modified program material to federal agency
- 60-day timeline starts from Friday letter
- Failure to comply could result in loss of federal grant funding
The review process change
Federal agency altered planned evaluation:
- Agency asked states to submit PREP material in April for “medical accuracy review”
- Concluded gender-ideology references outside scope of statute
- “Changing our planned course of action and are no longer conducting a review for medical accuracy”
- Content determined to be “outside of the subjects that are statutorily authorized”
Read more:
• California ordered to delete gender ideology from federally funded sex ed program
This article is written with the assistance of generative artificial intelligence based solely on Washington Times original reporting and wire services. For more information, please read our AI policy or contact Ann Wog, Managing Editor for Digital, at awog@washingtontimes.com
The Washington Times AI Ethics Newsroom Committee can be reached at aispotlight@washingtontimes.com.