<![CDATA[Donald Trump]]><![CDATA[genocide]]><![CDATA[white house]]>Featured

Trump Epically Ambushed the South African President in the Oval Office – PJ Media

In March, President Donald Trump announced a full halt to U.S. foreign aid to South Africa, citing the government’s racially charged abuse of white Afrikaner farmers. He blasted the regime for orchestrated land seizures and escalating violence, calling the country “a bad place to be right now.” At the same time, he offered a fast track to U.S. citizenship for South African farmers and their families seeking safety from persecution.





The black-led South African government has flatly denied any campaign of anti-white violence, brushing off the attacks as fiction and painting any criticism as offensive. But the facts on the ground — brutal murders, farm invasions, and open calls for land expropriation — tell a different story.

On Wednesday, in a high-stakes Oval Office meeting, Trump directly challenged South African President Cyril Ramaphosa with hard evidence of racially motivated violence. While the media works overtime to downplay the confrontation, Trump once again cut through the diplomatic spin and forced an uncomfortable truth into the open.

When Trump asked what it would take to convince him there was no genocide in South Africa, Ramaphosa suggested Trump should “listen to the voices of South Africans.”

But Trump wasn’t going to be told not to believe the facts, and in a move that turned the tables on Ramaphosa, Trump asked to dim the lights and played footage showing the brutal reality that South Africa’s government desperately wants to hide. 

Here’s the video he showed to Ramaphosa:

And here’s how it went down in the Oval Office:





Ramaphosa’s discomfort was palpable as he couldn’t even bring himself to watch the evidence of violence in his own country. That’s cute: look away all you want, but the truth doesn’t disappear.

The footage included inflammatory speeches by Julius Malema, the radical leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters, who has a documented history of anti-white rhetoric. When confronted with this evidence, Ramaphosa tried to dismiss it as merely the product of “multi-party democracy,”

Recommended: Democrats Don’t Need More Scandals Now, but Here Comes One

“We have a multi-party democracy in South Africa that allows people to express themselves,” he said, as if that somehow makes calls for violence acceptable.

While South African officials scramble to deny the existence of anti-white violence, Trump laid out the facts: “You do allow them to take land… and then when they take the land, they kill the white farmer, and when they kill the white farmer, nothing happens to them.” The president’s decision to cut off foreign aid to South Africa now looks more appropriate than ever.

The meeting reached its crescendo when Trump, paging through recent news articles, repeatedly emphasized “death, death, death.” 

 The President’s response was swift and decisive, citing “thousands of stories” and “documentaries” that tell a very different story than the official narrative.





This confrontation proves once again why Trump’s unorthodox diplomatic style serves America’s interests. While other leaders might dance around difficult topics, Trump brings them right into the spotlight, even if it makes his diplomatic guests squirm in their seats. 

It was the most savage thing to happen in the Oval Office since Trump schooled Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.


While other outlets sweep uncomfortable truths under the rug, we’re committed to exposing what’s really happening in South Africa and beyond. Get unlimited access to our in-depth coverage and exclusive content by becoming a VIP member. Use the code FIGHT for 60% off and support fearless journalism that doesn’t back down from hard truths.





Source link

Related Posts

1 of 1,167