<![CDATA[Antisemitism]]><![CDATA[Democrat Party]]><![CDATA[Graham Platner]]><![CDATA[Hamas]]>Featured

Democrats Admit That Platner Is the New Face of Their Party – HotAir

Not so long ago, we all thought that Ilhan Omar, AOC, Bernie, and the socialists were the radical face of the Democratic Party. 

Those were good times, in retrospect. None of them were openly calling for the outright murder of anyone, and their antisemitism turns out to be pretty tame in comparison to what is becoming mainstream in the Democratic Party. As far as we know, none has flirted with Nazism out of hatred for Jews, and Omar was at least relatively circumspect in her support for Hamas‘ military tactics of suicide bombings and raping civilians. 





Of course, the slope was already slippery when they went down it. It was a very short slip from Bernie Sanders to AOC, to Ilhan Omar, to Zohran Mamdani, to Hasan Piker, and Graham Platner. And the slip was inevitable, as is usually the case with slippery slopes, which always seem to lead to their logical conclusion: the bottom. 

I have written about both Hasan Piker and Graham Platner because they are not outliers, but the center of gravity in the Democratic Party. Democrats from 10 years ago, who thought that Barack Obama was a centrist and who still think of themselves as Obama Democrats, may not love the new direction of their party, but they are reconciled to it. We know that because they say so, and because they follow up with their votes. 





Hasan Piker was invited by The New York Times to share his reflections on the assassination of Charlie Kirk, as if a man who regularly calls for the murder of people he dislikes, including Senators, landlords, capitalists in general, and innocent health care executives, were best equipped to lecture us on political violence. 

He is now a regular on their pages and podcasts, opining on these matters, and a feature at campaign events for Democrats. 





Matt Yglesias will give high-minded explanations for why a Nazi tattoo—an SS Totenkopf of all things—is no big deal at all. 

I don’t believe that Platner is a literal Nazi, but rather a man attracted to violent and extremists of all kinds, and ideologically more a communist. Whether he is a Nazi is not the point; he is an antisemite, believes that violence is the answer, trains Antifa in violent tactics, including the use of guns, and Democrats love the guy so much that they dumped one of the most popular progressive governors out there to nominate him. He praised Hamas, which thrilled Hasan Piker, and the entire Democratic Party is rallying around him. 

The Democratic Party is rallying around Platner, and even Chuck Schumer has bowed to the inevitable. That’s because they know that their base is now Platner’s fans, and Piker’s fans, and that their less radical voters will still come out to vote for literal communists who support violent revolutions. It is the Jay Jones lesson. 





Not so long ago, Trump holding a rally at Madison Square Garden and Elon Musk waving to the crowd were proof positive that they were outside the bounds of reasonable politics. Pete Hegseth has a tattoo of the same cross that is displayed at the National Cathedral, which made him unfit to be Secretary of War. 

But a Totenkopf is no big deal. He’s our guy. We love him. 

My point is not that Democrats are hypocrites. Of course they are. To a certain extent, all politicians are, although Democrats rely more on their presumed virtue and compassion than Republicans, so it grates more. 





It’s that Democrats are embracing the extremism of the left, excusing the very worst people, inciting the violence both with their language and their justification of it by embracing people like Platner and Piker. Five years ago, it was the embrace of rioting; now it is the embrace of Jay Jones, Hasan Piker, Luigi Mangione, and Graham Platner. 

When you see Democrats celebrating assassinations and lamenting that Trump is still alive, it’s tempting to think it is a small minority online. And, to be sure, most Democrats will not openly opine on TikTok about it. But the fact that it is doctors, nurses, and teachers doing it so frequently tells you that it is not exactly out of bounds behind closed doors, and the fact that Hasan Piker and Graham Platner are rising stars tells you that Democratic Party voters are happy to embrace those who do. 





Graham Platner is becoming the standard-bearer for the Democrats in Maine, and Abdul El-Sayid is on the way to being one in Michigan. This tells you where the Democrats are. 

That “moderate” Democrats will vote for them—and they will—tells you where they are. This is not about policy disagreements; it’s about embracing a violent and hateful style of politics, justifying it, as all totalitarians do, with an appeal to virtue. 

Hasan Piker just tweeted out photos of him reading Lenin’s “What Is to Be Done?” The whole point is the revolution, and Democrats seem fine with that. 

The New York Times can’t condemn this? Instead, they share his opinions on their pages and podcasts, while Obama’s team platforms him.

Obama, The New York Times, Ezra Klein, the Senate Democrats, and presidential candidates are all endorsing this, and Democratic voters are taking it in stride. 

Because, somehow, they claim this is how to fight the “Nazi” Republicans. 







Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy HotAir’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join HotAir VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.





Source link

Related Posts

1 of 2,533