Scotland needs its water checked and, like, STAT. Unless the entire country’s been taken over by aliens – which could possibly be true, I discount nothing anymore – this level of all-encompassing insanity has to have a source.
As I told you earlier, Scotland’s infamous “Hate Crime Law” went into effect on 1 April. It was championed by none other than the king of hateful speech himself, Humza Yousaf, the country’s first minister. It is, for all effects and purposes, legislation against thought crimes and has created a class system of victims whom you dare not look at, criticize, or even walk swiftly by whilst ignoring.
All of these things, should said designated victim take offense, could see you dragged down to the local cop shop for interrogation or worse. Cruel eyes, whether you deployed them or not, are now chargeable under Humza Yousaf’s draconian sense of victimhood justice.
Contrary to all rosy assurances from proponents of the legislation that none of these feared developments would be the case at all, little old ladies have already been carted off to their nearest Police Scotland station for a thorough going-over with authorities.
Their crime?
A dispute with neighbors.
2 in 3 Scots believe the Hate Crime Act should be repealed.
Yet Humza Yousaf seems to think that he’s right and everyone else is wrong.
Humza Yousaf’s Hate Crime law is wasting police time and threatening free speech. It must be scrapped. pic.twitter.com/2jgyY5n6Ak
— Scottish Conservatives (@ScotTories) April 18, 2024
Yousaf himself has been incensed by thousands of reports filed against him for hate speech against whites in Scotland. His only true goal has been to be able to clap J.K. Rowling in irons for her anti-transgender ideology stance.
She irritates the crap out of the man and is unabashedly challenging the lunacy of the law and he can’t shut her down.
But, in fact, Yousaf’s incendiary anti-white speech on the floor of the Scottish parliament was so racist that the official transcript was changed by the government.
They completely changed it’s context by adding ‘is’ multiple times. Took the clear vitriol out of it and made it seem more reasonable.
Why did Police Scotland not instead refer to the now infamous video evidence directly in any case??
— soulstorm_design (David Whyte) (@slstrm_dsgn) April 18, 2024
And that transcript of “SCOTLAND IS TOO DAMN WHITE” is what Scottish police used when they dismissed the hate-crime reports against Yousaf. They did not refer to the video of his speech.
Neat, huh?
Whereas Rowling’s tweets stand on their own, and she stands boldly behind them. No one had to clean or “clarify” (read: sanitize”) anything up for her.
“Holyrood admits changing the official record of Humza Yousaf’s ‘white’ speech to ‘clarify the meaning’” – Scottish Daily Express https://t.co/0pN82aeXOT
— Bob M 🇬🇧💫 (@bobmca1) April 18, 2024
That’s a scandal right there.
But it gets worse. It’s important to remember that in the original hate crime bill, women were left out. There were no specific protections for “women” unless you happened to be a woman of one of the included victim classes. Fuggedaboudit white woman.
Transgenders got protection from implied cruel looks, or being called “Sir” if they were males.
Yousaf has now proposed a “MISOGYNY” companion to the new law, which would now PROTECT already victim-class protected “trans” women (aka MEN) from hateful acts against women.
I NEED A COCKTAIL
Trans-identified men have sent violent threats to women but the likes of Beth Douglas (attached) now receive double protection from Yousaf: for his so-called gender identity, and for also being, in the eyes of the Scottish government, a woman. 2/2https://t.co/98yBu7UXmD
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) April 16, 2024
WAIT, WHUT
That definition of ” misogyny” again is:
Humza Useless is a barking mad, hate-filled lunatic.
What could be worse than a law that criminalises misogyny? A law that criminalises ‘misogyny’ against men.
This week, Humza Yousaf announced that the SNP’s planned anti-misogyny law will cover literally ‘anyone’ who feels they have been ‘affected’ by misogyny. Of course, as everyone knows, misogyny means the hatred of women. Yet the Scottish first minister is adamant that transwomen should also be included in the proposed law because, supposedly, ‘they will often be the ones who suffer threats of rape or threats of disfigurement’ that are driven by misogyny. According to Yousaf, ‘the man making the threat doesn’t know’ whether he is threatening ‘a transwoman or a cis woman’, and that the ‘perception’ of womanhood is all that matters.
I mean…WTFO?
‘Scotland’s most powerful politician is telling us that trans women are indistinguishable from biological women. Not just that: he is arguing that a law against misogyny is needed to protect the very people who categorically cannot experience it.’
https://t.co/g0OlxKJoRd— Julie Scott 🍒 (@judgejules75) April 17, 2024
Yousaf’s obviously been on glue long enough.
The question is, “HAS SCOTLAND?!“
Put the bottle down and back away from this guy.