Biden AdministrationCommentaryFeaturedJoe BidenMedia watchThe New York TimesU.S. News

The New York Times Torches Biden for ‘Troubling’ Media Strategy in Official Statement

President Joe Biden campaigned on transparency in 2020 en route to the White House.

In her first press briefing, former Biden White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki spoke to reporters  about the “importance of bringing truth and transparency back to the briefing room.”

However, the reality has been so far removed from the rhetoric that establishment media outlets like the New York Times are now calling out the Biden administration for establishing a “dangerous precedent that future presidents can use to avoid scrutiny and accountability.”

Trending:

Biden Calls for Record-High Taxes … We’re Closing in on a 50% Rate

On Thursday, The New York Times released a blistering statement condemning Biden for largely shunning interviews with journalists — a statement that came as the paper is facing criticism from liberals over a Politico report detailing tensions between the Times and the Biden White House, per Politico.

The original Politico piece, published on Wednesday and that which spurred the Times statement, details The Gray Lady’s persistent effort for over three years to secure a comprehensive sit-down interview with President Joe Biden.

Obtaining an on-the-record discussion with the commander-in-chief has become a top priority for the paper’s publisher, A.G. Sulzberger.

The Times’ pursuit of this interview dates back to last May when Vice President Kamala Harris visited the paper’s Manhattan headquarters. During an off-the-record meeting with around 40 Times journalists, Sulzberger directly asked Harris several times why Biden continued refusing to grant an interview to the Times or any other major newspaper outlet, Politico reported.

Are you surprised the New York Times did this?

According to three attendees, Harris suggested Sulzberger contact the White House press office about the matter and then privately grumbled to aides that the discussion with Sulzberger was a waste of time allotted for the meeting.

“For anyone who understands the role of the free press in a democracy, it should be troubling that President Biden has so actively and effectively avoided questions from independent journalists during his term,” The Times wrote. “The president occupies the most important office in our nation, and the press plays a vital role in providing insights into his thinking and worldview, allowing the public to assess his record and hold him to account.

“Mr. Biden has granted far fewer press conferences and sit-down interviews with independent journalists than virtually all of his predecessors.

“It is true that The Times has sought an on-the-record interview with Mr. Biden, as it has done with all presidents going back more than a century. If the president chooses not to sit down with The Times because he dislikes our independent coverage, that is his right, and we will continue to cover him fully and fairly either way.

“However, in meetings with Vice President Harris and other administration officials, the publisher of The Times focused instead on a higher principle: That systematically avoiding interviews and questions from major news organizations doesn’t just undermine an important norm, it also establishes a dangerous precedent that future presidents can use to avoid scrutiny and accountability.

Related:

New York Times Newsroom in Chaos, Leadership Looking to Crush ‘Rebellion’: Report

“That is why Mr. Sulzberger has repeatedly urged the White House to have the president sit down with The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Reuters, CNN and other major independent news organizations that millions of Americans rely on to understand their government.”

According to Politico, Biden’s circle has almost entirely avoided print media interviews during his presidency. In three years, Biden has granted in-depth interviews to just two print journalists: Josh Boak of The Associated Press and Evan Osnos of The New Yorker magazine.

Both Biden and Harris seem far more comfortable talking and appearing on left-wing podcasts, where they are certain not to be asked any tough questions.

For instance, on Friday, Biden sat down for a softball interview on shock jock Howard Stern’s radio show, according to the New York Post.

Earlier this month, Harris appeared on an Oklahoma City-based podcast called “I’ve Had It,” where they discussed people who take off their shoes on planes, among other issues, according to The Oklahoman.

The media are supposed to be watchdogs of the government, holding them accountable when they fail their responsibilities to the people.

An administration that does not consider itself answerable to the media does not consider itself accountable to the people –and these are media outlets in which the majority of the participants sympathize with their point of view.

More so, the American people have every right to know whether or not the country’s octogenarian president can even answer basic, real-time questions.

Establishment media outlets like the Times are now calling out the Biden administration for their utter avoidance of any scrutiny, and it’s long overdue.


A Note from Our Deputy Managing Editor:

 

I heard a chilling comment the other day: “We don’t even know if an election will be held in 2024.” 

 

That wasn’t said by a conspiracy theorist or a doomsday prophet. No, former U.S. national security advisor Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn said that to the founder of The Western Journal, Floyd Brown.

 

Gen. Flynn’s warning means that the 2024 election is the most important election for every single living American. If we lose this one to the wealthy elites who hate us, hate God, and hate what America stands for, we can only assume that 248 years of American history and the values we hold dear to our hearts may soon vanish.

 

The end game is here, and as Benjamin Franklin said, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”

 

All of this means that without you, it’s over. We have the platform, the journalists, and the experience to fight back hard, but Big Tech is strangling us through advertising blacklists, shadow bans, and algorithms. Did you know that we’ve been blacklisted by 90% of advertisers? Without direct support from you, our readers, we can’t continue the fight.

 

Can we count on your support? It may not seem like much, but a Western Journal Membership can make all the difference in the world because when you support us directly, you cut Big Tech out of the picture. They lose control. 

 

A monthly Western Journal Membership costs less than one coffee and breakfast sandwich each month, and it gets you access to ALL of our content — news, commentary, and premium articles. You’ll experience a radically reduced number of ads, and most importantly you will be vitally supporting the fight for America’s soul in 2024.

 

We are literally counting on you because without our members, The Western Journal would cease to exist. Will you join us in the fight? 

 

Sincerely,

Josh Manning

Deputy Managing Editor

The Western Journal



Source link